Tuesday, 8 December 2009

The Senols family.

I have not been able to get out and about, so have been confined to the computer. Therefore I have turned my attention to another family. All prompted by questions which keep niggling away - where are Isaac Wilcockson and his wife Amelia in the 1841 census? and did Isaac marry Amelia for a dowry? Isaac the newspaperman and his wife lived in the better part of Preston, I think he ran a carriage and he was involved in the civic life of the town. I did wonder if they were down in London visiting her family - so I set about looking for them. Then I had a look to see if I could find out about their background. I am putting what I found on here because I have finished trying to follow this avenue of thought and knowing me will misplace the notes, also found it fascinating and want to put down my thoughts at the moment. The absolute answers to these family history questions will never be known with certainty and I find that my thoughts on particular issues change when I read new material or find new information. So whilst I write here what I think today, tomorrow I might well have revised my thinking.
 
I am leaning more to the thought that Isaac was a self made man. I need to get hold of the biography of Edward Bains, he wrote the history of Lancashire books, (he was apprenticed to the same man as Isaac?) went to Leeds and ran a newspaper there. His son wrote the biography saying his father was a self made man .......I also am reading "Building Jerusalem" by Tristram Hunt. It would seem that it was a requirement to be part of 'society' that they were involved in 
 civic matters. As for Amelia Senols' family, I think they were a 'trade' family much the same as the Wilcocksons. So I think he was marrying someone of the same standing. I still have not found Isaac and Amelia on the 1841 census, I have found the street they lived on by tracing their neighbours, but the houses are not numbered. There is no indication of uninhabited houses. They could just have been missed out as an enumerator error, they could have been visiting, or an alternative that I had not thought of is that they could have been travelling say in Europe. This idea has come through the orbituary of Isaac's cousin who lived in Preston - Michael Satterthwaite. 

I would welcome any more information or any suggestions.

Anyway, here follows the story of the Senols family ..........

Try putting Senols in the IGI site, or on ancestry and you do not get very many results. Try putting Senols in google and one reason could be that it might be a Turkish name. Were they an immigrant family? 

The earliest marriage that is interesting is
18 January 1769
Edward Collinson parish of Michael Crooked Lane, London Bachelor and Elisabeth Ball of this parish spinster, married by licence. Both signed and the witnesses were : Thomas Ball, George Barton, Anne Andrews, S. Adderley, Dinah Smith.
(I think Elisabeth and Thomas were Amelia's Aunt and Uncle through her mother).

Edward Collinson is a common name, there is a will for Edward Collinson Tin plate worker, Lombard Street, City of London 1809.

Then the marriage of Amelia's parents
12 August 1776.
James Senols of the parish of St. Giles Cripplegate London Bachelor and Jenny Ball of the Parish of St. Edmund and King London spinster and minor (more writting I cannot read, might say consent of brother) married by licence. Both signed and witnesses were Chas. Greenwood and Edward Collinson.
Charles was James business partner and Edward his brother-in-law.

This marriage was reported in the London Chronicle on Saturday August 10 1776???????
Yesterday was married Mr. James Senols, of Fore-Street, Oilman, to Miss Jane Ball, of Lombard-Street.
Also reported in Gazetteer, New Daily Advertiser and Morning Post.
Monday was married at St. Edmund the King, Lombard-Street, Mr. James Senols, of Fore-Street, Oilman, to Miss Jane Ball, of Lombard-Street.
Why was this marriage reported in the newspapers?

And now perhaps the most interesting marriage
17 May 1778 Saint John at Hackney
John Dryland of the parish of St Mary Whitechapel in the county of Middlesex bachelor and Eliz Seynoid of St John Hackney were married in this church by licence. Both signed - John Dryland, Elizabeth Senonls and the witnesses were Ann Coopler? Mary Senols, Henry Senols, Ja. Senols, Jenny Senols, E. Collinson and Eliz. Collinson.

Does this suggest that there were sibblings (perhaps Ann was a sister too) Mary, Henry, James and Elizabeth Senols?

Mary went on to marry 2 December 1795
Thomas Joslin of this parish and Hamlet of M&C J bachelor and Mary Senols of this parish and same hamlet spinster married by banns. Both signed and witnesses were John Dryland and Elizabeth Dryland.
**************************************
I tell you now that I am still confused about "Jane", I think sometimes Jenny, Amelia's mother was called Jane and there is also "Jane" who was Amelia's sister-in-law. Then there are the two James. So I shall appologise now if I muddle them up, and if you can make sense and clarify any mistakes please do tell me. Also some of the documents online are difficult to read. I have not made any copies of these because I view this as background research and I do not have a printer.

I think that James and Jenny (Jane) had the following children, although not all baptisms have been found -
Jane Ball Senols 
Thomas Ball Senols
Amelia Senols 
Mary Ball Senols  
and James Senols (possibly James Daniel?)






Wednesday, 7 October 2009

1822 Guild

I had a spare half hour yesterday, so decided to spend it copying up part of the book by Isaac Wilcockson about the Guild Merchant of Preston  1822. This copy is in a reference library, a secondhand bookseller in Preston told me there is a larger copy of this book but it seldom comes on the market and when it does it is very expensive to buy. It is only a small book, and most of it is concerned with the upper classes and what entertainment they got up to. The Guild of Preston is something I need to read up about. At the moment as I understand it, it took place every 20 years and the one of 1822 lasted two weeks. I wonder if the Quakers attended the festivities. Near the end of the book is a bit which perhaps was more relevant to our ancestors. 
I would like to find out more about this time period, please correct me if I am wrong -the Napoleonic wars ended 1815, this was a time of economic hardship for ordinary people, price of bread high. (And how does this tie in with Jane Austens works.) 
I love the detail Isaac goes into. I wonder if Isaac attended all the festivities. Words in green, my own questions, if you could answer them or add any thoughts would welcome any comments.

page 117-119
GENERAL NOTICES
Admission to the Entertainments.
The Mayor's Ball on Wednesday in the first week, and the Mayoress' Public Breakfast on Thursday in the second, were given gratuitously, at the expence of the Corporation, and tickets of admission were granted to all persons applying for them, who had been introduced to the Mayor and Mayoress. His worship also gave dinners in the Guild Hall by invitation, and was attended almost every day, by about 60 gentlemen, who on each occasion sat down to a repast which was provided on the most liberal, and even sumptuous scale.
Admission to the other entertainments was obtained by tickets, which were sold at the Booksellers and Perfumers' shops, at the following prices:- Balls, Monday, September 2 and 9, and Charity Ball, 10s. 6d.; Fancy Ball, 15s.; Masqued Ball, £1. 1s. Subscription to the Oratorios and concerts, £2. 2s. The same for the Chancel Gallery, £2. 12. 6d; Single Tickets, Oratorios, 10s. 6d.; Ditto, Chancel Gallery, 15s.; Single Tickets for Concerts, Boxes and Pit, 12s.; Gallery, 7s. 6d. The Theatre, during the first week; Boxes, 6s., Pit, 4s. 6d., Gallery, 2s.; they were reduced in the second to Boxes 4s. 6d., Pit, 2s. 6d., Gallery, 1s. (I wonder why they were reduced in the second week?) The charge for admission to the ground from which Mr. Livingston ascended in his Balloon was 5s.

General Amusements.
In the foregoing accounts we have confined our notices to those amusements which were either arranged under the immediate direction of the public authorities, or were so far patronized by the officers of the Guild, as to be admitted into their general programme. There were, however, many other sources of entertainment, where young and old, high and low, sought relaxation from the cares of life. A vacant space of ground at the top of North Road was thronged with shews (what did he mean by this choice of word?) of every description. To this spot the humble mechanic, and the rustic countryman resorted with their wives, their families. or their sweethearts, and derived perhaps as much gratification from the novelties here presented to them, as their superiors in rank obtained from the more refined enjoyments elaborated in the Ballroom and the Theatre.
Other parts of the town also held forth attractions of various kinds.
THE CIRCUS, under the management of Messrs. Adam and Powell, a temporary spacious building, in Woodcock's timber-yard, Fishergate, was uncommonly well supported. They had a very fine stud of horses, and some clever performers, both as riders, tight and slack rope vaulters, and tumblers.
WOMBWELL'S MAGNIFICENT COLLECTION OF WILD BEASTS, stationed first in the North Road, and afterwards in the Market Place, was a most interesting exhibition, but did not repay the public spirit of the proprietor. (?)
MARSHALL'S PANORAMA OF THE  BATTLE OF ALGIERS was very well attended, and gave great satisfaction. It was exhibited in a temporary wooden building, erected nearly opposite the Theatre, in Fishergate.
RYLEY (author of the Itinerant) endeavoured, with his BROOMS(?), to sweep off dull care from the minds of his audiences, but they did not prove sufficiently novel to draw crowded houses.
MADAME HENGLER gave several grand displays of Fire Works, at the Bowling Green near North Road, but the unfavourable state of the weather prevented many from attending, who would otherwise have patronized this ingenious woman.

Monday, 5 October 2009

Michael Satterthwaite

Posted on 5th October, in remembrance of Michael Satterthwaite's birthday.

Michael was the nephew of Esther (nee. Satterthwaite) Wilcockson so he was first cousin to her children. Michael was a Quaker and his name crops up on a lot of records. Michael lived in Preston. Like his cousin Isaac (the newspaper man) he seems a very interesting man, and like Isaac he had no children.

The Preston Guardian etc. Saturday July 13 1867
DEATHS
On the 6th instant at the residence of his nephew, Joseph Smithson, Halifax, Michael Satterthwaite, of Bank Parade, Preston, aged 82.
..........................................................................................
The Preston Guardian etc. Saturday July 13 1867
DEATH OF MR. MICHAEL SATTERTHWAITE
We have this week to record the death of an old and worthy townsman, one of our oldest inhabitants, and one of the few connecting links between the Preston of the present day and our ancient borough when it was "an elegant and economical town, the resort of well-born but ill-portioned and ill-endowed old maids and widows." Mr. Michael Satterthwaite died on Saturday evening last, at Halifax, while on a visit to a nephew, Mr. Joseph Smithson. He was in the 83rd year of his age, having been born on the 5th of October, 1784. He was one of the sons of Edward and Mary Satterthwaite. Edward Satterthwaite was a currier and leather cutter, who came to Preston about 90 years ago, from the neighbourhood of Hawkshead, the relaxation of our municipal laws, about that time, allowing of non-freemen to carry on business in the town. His wife, whose maiden name was Parkinson, came from Sawley, in Yorkshire. They were respected members of the Society of Friends, of which body their son, the subject of this notice, remained an honoured and influential member until his death. When Michael Satterthwaite was born, his parents lived in the premises now occupied by Mr. Orrell, shoemaker, but before Michael was a year old, they removed to the premises known as the "Big Patten", where Edward Satterthwaite carried on business until his death, in 1794. His widow continued the trade after her husband's death until her marriage with Mr. Ralph Alderson, who then carried it on, on the same premises, first on his own acount, and then in partnership with his step-son, until his death in 1832, Mrs Alderson having predeceased him five years. Mr. Alderson was a man of scientific tastes, and was one of the founders of the Preston Institution for the Diffusion of Knowldedge. Mr. Satterthwaite continued the business after the death of his partner, until March of the present year, when he retired in favour of two of his nephews. When he gave up, he was the oldest tradesman in Preston, having been in business above sixty years, and during the whole of that period on the same premises, a circumstance without a parallel in the shopkeeping annals of this town. This shop has long been a noted one, and its appearance tells to a stranger that its possessor was of the "old school:" its old fashioned bay windows, of a kind of which there are now few in the town, were about the first bay windows ever inserted in a shop in Preston; previously shops had windows no different than cottages. It was the fore runner, - some however claim for the shop of Mr. Prescott, saddler, in Cheapside, the honour of being a few months its senior - of many scores that have been since displaced for more modern shapes with greater capabilities of display. Antiquated as their appearance is, when first inserted, they were considered quite an enterprising innovation, and were regarded as one of the wonders of the town, so much so, that country people, on a market day, for long after their erection, considered a visit to the town incomplete without a peep at the "new shop windows."

Mr. Satterthwaite was a shrewd and energetic man of business, but with a keen relish for travelling as a relaxation. For many years he seldom missed going to London to attend the annual meeting of the Society of Friends, in whose affairs he ever took a deep interest, and on this occasion he usually made a tour of some part of England famous for historic associations or scenic beauty. He, on more than one occasion, extended his rambles to the continent, and , in the spring of last year, in his 82nd year, he was one of a party that went through France and Switzerland to Italy, extending their tour to Milan, Venice, Florence, Rome, Naples and Pompeii, and was one of the most active and observant of the many thousand interested spectators of the grand ceremonial which marked the Easter of that year in the "Eternal City." It was while on a visit to a nephew in Halifax, after a visit to the yearly meeting of the Friends' school at Ackworth, in Yorkshire, where he was himself educated, of which he was one of the trustees, and in the welfare of which he ever took a deep interest, that he closed his life. He had arranged for a trip to Wales during the present month.

When at business he was remarkable for close application thereto, and was highly esteemed as a high-minded and honourable tradesman. Although retiring and unobtrusive in daily life, he was not an uninterested observer of public events. Like most members of the Society of Friends he was a Liberal in politics, and an energetic and consistent supporter of every measure of political, social, commercial, and religious freedom. The first time that he had the privilege of a vote for a member of Parliament was at the general election of 1807, when George the Third dissolved parliament to get rid of Fox and the Whigs, and by which he unfortunately secured a long lease of power to Toryism, and its then attendants of political and commercial monopoly, and persecution and exclusion from civil offices of citizens on account of religious belief. On that occasion two candidates offered themselves together, one a Whig, the other a Tory, and though so opposite in their principles that they perhaps never voted together during a whole parliamentary session, they came forward together before the Preston constituency, they canvassed together, their names were subscribed to the same address, they had only one committee, and they jointly resisted any attempt to break through a compact providing for this state of things, and which, on political grounds, was certainly "unprincipled." Mr. Samuel Horrocks was the Tory candidate, and Lord Stanley, the late Earl of Derby, the Whig. The Independent Liberal party invited Mr. Joseph Hanson, Colonel Hanson, as he was styled, to fight their battle against the "coalition," and among the memorable "1,002" who supported Mr. Hanson on that occasion, was Mr. Satterthwaite. How few now survive who took a part in that exciting twelve days' contest! In a hasty glance over the 2,582 names of the voters who exercised the suffrage on that occasion, we only recognise the name of one person now living, John Bairstow, Esq; possibly there may be another or two, but the youngest voter on that occasion, if now living would be above eighty-one years old. From that time Mr. Satterthwaite was ever found in the Liberal ranks at the Preston elections, and he uniformly recorded his vote on the side of popular progress. In the local demonstrations in favour of parliamentary reform, municipal reform, Free Trade, and the abolition of negro slavery he was accustomed to take part.

In one department of public duty, Mr. Satterthwaite took his full share. On the first establishment of the Board of Guardians for the Preston Union, on the adoption, in this district, of the New Poor-Law, in the year 1837, he was elected one of the guardians for the town-ship of Preston, being returned, by a large majority, at the head of the poll. At the end of the term for which he was elected, he declined re-appointment, and was out of office two or three years. He afterwards resumed his place at the Board, and since that time with one exception, he has been re-elected for the town-ship, or for one of the wards into which the town is divided. For many years he was very active in the discharge of the duties devolving on him, and he has frequently filled the post of one of the vice-chairmen of the Board.

Mr. Satterthwaite was once, for a short period, a member of the Preston Corporation. On the 15th August 1838, he was elected a councillor for St. George's Ward, to supply the vacancy occasioned by the death of Mr. Bulman. He had only the opportunity of attending one meeting of the Corporation, for the term for which he was elected expired on the ensuing 1st of November, and he then declined re-election. With the exception of Mr. Dodd, who represented the same ward for a few weeks, in 1852, Mr. Satterthwaite's term of office as a town councillor is the shortest in the annals of the Preston Corporation. The deceased gentleman was a director of the Blackpool Pier Company, of the Lytham Pier Company, and of the Preston Steam Sawing Company.

Mr. Satterthwaite was one of the founders of the Preston Auxiliary of the British and Foreign Bible Society; he was a member of the committee of management from its establishment till the day of his death, and on the death of the late Mr. John Fisher, in 1864, he was appointed treasurer of the auxiliary. Two of his colleagues in the formation of the Preston Society still lives:- Mr. Thomas Clarke and Mr. John Hamer.

Mr. Statterthwaite was twice married, but on both occasions he lost his wife very shortly after entering the matriomonial state. He had never any family. He was seized with a fainting fit on Saturday evening, while walking with his nephew, in the streets of Halifax, and fell into his arms. He was taken to Mr. Smithson's house, and the assistance of two doctors was called in, but he expired immediately. He had on a few previous occasions had similar fits, and in other ways, within the last year or two had shown symptoms of failing health and strength, but until he had long passed his eightieth year, he was uncommonly hale and hearty. He preserved his business aptitude and memory to the last.

Yesterday, his remains were interred in the secluded graveyard of the Society of Friends, at Calder Bridge, near Garstang, near those of his sister, Mrs. Sarah Ord, a minister of the Society of Friends, who died a few months ago. The prohibition of intramural interments in Preston prevented his being buried in his own family grave, in the yard of the Preston Friends' Meeting House. His remains were followed to the grave by a large circle of relatives, in seven mourning coaches, and the funeral cortege was preceded, to the outskirts of the town, on the Garstang road, by about eighty or ninety gentlemen of the town, who thus showed their respect for the character of the deceased. As a mark of respect to the memory of the deceased, nearly all the shops in Friargate, and many in the Market-place, were closed as the funeral procession passed.

Monday, 31 August 2009

update

I am sorry that I have not been on here for so long, so a quick update as to what has not been happening.

Firstly, we visited Richard and Sheila. Thank you so much for making us feel so welcome and for sharing your research. It has been the highlight of my summer.

I have been unable to do any other family history this summer.

Dear daughter has graduated but unable to find a job. Something she is not at all happy with. She has only just received her jobseekers allowance from signing on in July. However local council were straight on at us to pay council tax, so have had to visit them several times and contend with phone calls from them. Thats what you get for being honest. At the same time, she has been involved in several choir commitments - making it impossible to settle into any kind of routine. She has joined the local gym and has volunteered to work in Bernardo's charity shop to gain some work experience. It is like living with a whirlwind.

Dear son has spent the summer in anticipation of A level results and the disappointment that the degree he wanted to take has been cancelled. Being restricted to the local university meant that he has had to opt for something he didn't really want to do. He did really well in his exams getting grades B,B,C. Now he is stressing over the actual going. There is no sign of his student finance being sorted out...so we are wondering if he is getting any money when he starts. Nobody seems to know what is happening. We are also trying to sort out DSA which has meant more meetings and more upset. He has a big assessment coming up this week, hope it is not too bad. The lady at the university was at pains to point out that university is all about being "independent", it's all so emotionally draining dealing with people that I feel do not understand the nature of the problem and just make you question yourself and your own judgement. Anyways he starts university on the 23rd of September, so I hope we can get into some kind of routine after then.

On top of all this, dear daughter persuaded me to change to broadband and we have a new laptop which has a different system to what we have been use to. What has happened is that I don't feel comfortable using this now, I have lost all my favourite websites, and have less time on the computer as it has become very popular ..........

I hope to get back to the Wilcocksons some time soon.


Friday, 1 May 2009

Denby family.

The following info is just for Chuck.

I have no expertise outside England, it is a case of trying to discover what records are available and where they are. Forums are a great place to get ideas from, the one I use most is
http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php from that site I found
https://wiki.familysearch.org/en/Portal:Brazil
Research in South America looks very challenging.

A background on the history of South America with Europe would give you an understanding of why the family was out in Brazil.
Using http://books.google.co.uk/ I did a search on "British merchants in Rio history" Some of the links take you to pages in the books. I have not read all the links.
From "A concise history of Brazil" by Boris Fausto and Arthur Brakel it would seem that by August 1808 there was a nucleus of between 150 and 200 British merchants and commercial agents in Rio. Napoleon had taken over Portugal and Price Dom Joao VI of Portugal moved his entire court to Brazil, up to 15,000 people sailed to Brazil in Portuguese ships escorted by a British fleet. Joao opened Brazils ports to friendly nations, Great Britain being the chief beneficiary.
From similar searches on the main google site, I found that an English church was built in Rio de Janeiro in 1820.

Again I have no expertise in merchant shipping. I wonder if there are any records concerning ships. That might be another area to explore. Even if you found no information on your Denby family it all gives useful background knowledge.

So as a starting point it MIGHT and is only a guess at best that a Denby male went to Brazil sometime after 1807 and had a family out there. He was probably British but not definitely. He was most likely a merchant.

Doing a general google search on "Denby Brazil"
http://genforum.genealogy.com/denby/messages/310.html
Perhaps you could contact this person. I have not used this genforum site. But he has given you a few more names to go on. Of course you do not know if and how they are related. There could have been more than one Denby family in Brazil.

Armed with the new names I then turned back to the English Census.
In 1881 living in Toxteth Park
Virginia C. Thompson 45 widow born with Caroline M. 28, Juliana 24 and Robert 18 CARLOTTA ALLEN 25 visitor all born Rio de Janerio with 2 servants.
So this gives you a connection to your Barten Fletcher Allen family.
Were Carlotta and Virginia sisters, and this Carlotta Virginia's niece?
[death Mar quater 1880 George Armitage Thompson age 66 W. Derby - Virginia's husband?]

Unfortunately I have not been able to trace Virginia and her family any further.
....................................................................................
In 1861 living in Leamington
Sophia Thompson 41 widow Fund holder, living with Agnes Jane 13 and James G. 11 with 3 servants.
1871 living in Leeds
Sophia A. Thompson 51 property owner born Rio, Maria A. 25 born Rio, Agnes J. 23 born Birkenhead, James G. 21 iron manufacturer born Birkenhead and 3 servants.

there is a death Sep quarter 1877 James George Thompson age 28 Birkenhead

1881 living in Birkenhead Sophia A. Thompson 61 widow Lady independant born Brazil, Agnes J. 33 and 3 servants.
1891 cannot find them.
1901 living Birkenhead Sophia A. Thompson 81 born Brazil with 3 servants.

Death Dec quarter 1903 Sophia Amelia Thompson age 83 Birkenhead.
Was this another sister to Carlotta and Virginia?
.............................................................................
Now looking for male Denby born in Brazil I found ;

1881 John Henry Denby 57 born Brazil a retired merchant living in Leamington Priors with wife Maria Louisa 36 born USA N.York and 2 servants.

possible death 1883, John Henry Denby age 59 Warwick.
.............................................................................
1891 living in Kensington
William C. Denby 62 shipowner born Brazil with wife Mary 48 born Stone and 3 servants.

perhaps of interest is a marriage in Dec quarter 1882
William Charles Denby to Mary Sharp in Kensington.
This certificate should name William's father.

1901 living in Kensington
William C. Denby 73 living on own means born Brazil with wife Mary 65 born Staffs. Stone and Mary E. Sandilands 45 born Brazil, Robert B Sandilands 7 born Scotland, Mary A. Sandilands 6 born Scotland and 3 servants.

death Jun quarter 1906 William Charles Denby age 78 Kensington.
.....................................................................
It could be that they are all one family brothers and sisters, if so they would be :
Sophia Amelia Denby born about 1820
John Henry Denby born about 1824
William Charles Denby born about 1829
Carlotta Maria Denby born about 1834
Virginia Caroline Denby born about 1836

but this is just speculation, you need to find some other proof.
...................................................................
Also found on the IGI
batch number C006383
Grace Roscoe Allen b. 28 Jul 1854 Rio De Janeiro,
Basten Fletcher Allen + Carlota Maria Denby

and for Tijuca, Rio De Janeiro
Caroline Emilia Thompson b. 6 May 1852
Julianan Carlota Thompson b. 22 Aug 1856
Jane Amy Thompson b. 20 Mar 1858
parents George Armitage Thompson + Virginia Caroline Denby
.................................................................
Good luck with your hunting.



Saturday, 25 April 2009

Opening of the Preston and Wyre Railway.

There is mention in this article of Barton Fletcher Allen.
Did Isaac Wilcockson write this article?
Was Isaac present, did he see George Stephenson?
How many others of our families were in the crowd witnessing this event?
(I thought this was a short article but it has taken me three evenings to handwrite it from the screen, I hope it does not take as long to type up. And I found it fascinating. How many times have I travelled on the Blackpool line!)
************************************************
The Preston Chronicle and Lancashire Advertiser.
Preston. Printed and published by Wilcockson and Dobson.
17 Market-Place
price 4half D ready money
5s3D per Qr on credit
or 4s9D per Qr if paid in advance.
Saturday July 18 1840
************************************************
Opening of the Preston and Wyre Railway.

This railway was publicly opened on Wednesday last, under the immediate management of the directors, engineers and contractors. For some days previously several experimental trips had been made, with a view to prove the perfect readiness and to test the security of the line - a precaution highly praiseworthy on the part of the directors. The opening, on Wednesday, created a very powerful and lively interest. A great number of the principal inhabitants of this town and of the surrounding neighbourhood were specially invited to be present on the occasion, and by eleven o'clock, the time appointed for being at the North Union station, thousands of spectators, including a goodly sprinkling of fashionably attired ladies, were assembled to witness. Our readers are probably aware that the North Union Company have contracted, for a certain period, to work the Wyre line, and this is the reason why the starting place was from that station. Between eleven and twelve o'clock, the station and its environs presented a scene of great bustle and animation, the greatest anxiety being manifested by everyone to participate in the rejoicings of the 'opening day'. It was at this period that we were rendered fully alive to the value of our 'ticket', as scores and scores of persons were running about in all directions, anxiously and importunately desiring, either for love or money, to be included among the privileged lot. From all the convenient places at, and adjacent to the station, as well as from the engines and several of the carriages, flags and banners of every hue were proudly waving, while two excellent bands of music contributed their exhilirating influence to the interest, gaiety, and excitement of the occasion.

At a quarter before twelve o'clock, the travellers having taken their places in the carriages, and everything being in readiness, two splendid engines, decked with gorgeous colours, moved gracefully forward, and being instantly attached to the train, we started on our jouney, amidst the enthusiastic acclamation of the assembled multitude. All the way to the viaduct at Tulketh, the road was thickly lined by spectators of both sexes, and of all classes and conditions, who lustily and loudly cheered us on our course. Indeed, it was very good and very thoughtful of our kind friends to keep up our spirits on our approaching to the viaduct, - for many very dark and dismal forebodings had been whispered aboard as to the fate that there awaited us; and although as an outside index every countenance wore the smile of joy and the aspect of buoyancy, yet undeniably hundreds there were who secretly feared and trembled for the result of that part of our probation - or rather, we should say, the probation of the bridge, for, where we sat, one gentleman was heard to say, with a rueful countenauce, on nearing it, in reference to the speed being a little increased, "that it was most dangerous and exceedingly improper." We went however gallantly and safely over, and when on the other side we were greeted by the loud and enthusiastic gratulations of the thousands who had assembled to lament over our downfall, or to exault over our preservation from it, the aforesaid gentleman, doffing his rueful countenance, and mingling in the triumphant shout, was heard coolly to declare, "that it was evidently very safe, and exceedingly proper." We mention this little incident mainly because the 'exceeding propriety' exclamation formed, in a certain circle, one of the standing jokes of the day. On starting from the North Union station the train consisted of eleven carriages, and on arriving at the Wyre station, which is at the junction of the Lancaster and Wyre lines, three more were attatched.

From Tulketh, we proceeded as pleasantly as could be desired, to the Kirkham station, where hundreds, and perhaps thousands, had congregated together to witness the novel spectacle. Here again we were hailed with loud huzzas ; and the good people of Kirkham were evidently in high glee at the commencement of railway operations in their locality. Precisely at fifty minutes from the time of starting, we arrived at the Poulton station where every thing wore the appearance of a gay and gladsome holiday. From the Church steeple a flag was waving, while the bells sent forth their merry peals. The concourse of spectators was immense, and their reception of the train was of no common kind. Loud and long were the shouts of enthusiasm which issued from the motley group, and manifold were the compliments and gratulations interchanged between friend and friend. After a short stay in Poulton, we proceeded on our journey, and in a few minutes arrived at the embankment on which the railway is carried over the bay to Fleetwood, a distance of about two miles. This we crossed without the least accident or interruption, arriving at Fleetwood, a distance of 19(and three quarters) miles from Preston, in precisely one hour from the time of starting. We must not omit to add, that nothing could be more steady and agreeable than the movement of the carriages on the rails. It is highly creditable to the directors, to have brought the line into such excellent trim before opening it.

On entering Fleetwood, the appearance of the town and hrabour were extremely imposing. The day being fine, the crowd of visitors was exceedingly vast, and comprised a very great number of elegantly attired females. While descending from the carriages, four times four rounds of cheering, loud as peals of thunder, broke upon the ear ; the bands struck up their inspiring music, and ever and anon the jolly tars on board the different vessels, gave us 'the minute gun at sen', not in tones of soft music, but in real artrillery. In the river, besides a number of other craft, three handsome steam vessels were cruizing, while as soon as we alighted from the carriages, were in readiness for an excursion. In a very short time they were all 'standing out,' each being abundantly freighted with passengers, and as they gracefullly moved up the magnificent estuary, the coup d'oeil, and all the associations connected with it, were of a character almost to beggar description. On the steamer where it was our lot to get ensconced, Sir Hesketh Fleetwood was a fellow voyager, and many and ardent were the gratulations he received from persons of all classes and all interests. This we feel bound to state, for it came under our personal observation.

(I shall come back to type some more of this latter, my fingers are sore.)

After about an hour's cruize, during which we passed the beautiful lighthouse, recently erected near the estuary, we returned to Fleetwood, and took a river side tour round the town. At the observatory, refreshments were provided, which, after our long ride and breezy sull, were very acceptable.

After a short sojourn at the several public buildings and other works which are in progress here, we repaired to
THE DEJEUNER
Here a splendid reception awaited us. We were ushered into a superb pavilion, here after to be used as the station shed, but fitted up on this occasion with all the show, glitter and pomp of a banqueting hall. Two long tables were arranged all the length of the immense apartment, which were united at the western extremity by the cross table. This arrangement of the tables left a large rectangle in the centre, which was occupied by the piano-forte, and a party of glee singers, who were engaged for the occasion. The bands of music, which kept playing at intervals during the entertainment, were also stationed in this portion of the room. The repast itself was in excellent keeping with all the rest of the arrangements. It was a cold collation, and included everything that the most fastidious appetite could desire, or the most skilful epicure invent. Mr. Benjamin Smith, of the Castle Inn, in this town, was the principal purveyor, and the provisions, the attendance, the cooking, and the hospitable scale on which everything was conducted, reflected the hightest credit upon his catering, and upon the skill and activity of Mrs. Smith, the worthy hostess of the Castle. Mr. Taylor, of Poulton, had some share in furnishing the repast, to the extent, we believe, of fifty guests, and so far as we could learn, he gave the fullest satisfaction. The wines were supplied by Mr. E. Sidgreaves, of this town, and they were of excellent quality. Of prime port and sherry, and sparkling champagne there was no lack, and every person partook ad libitum. The desert, including all the horticultural delicacies of the season, was also amply provided, and supplied to the guests without stint, and without exception. About a quarter-past three, the dejeuner commenced and Sir HESKETH FLEETWOOD, Bart., M.P., took the chair.

Among the gentlemen who sat near to him, and who were present at the entertainment in other parts of the room, we noticed Reece Bevan, Esq. of Wigan; Wm. Garnett, Esq., of Lark Hill, W. Garnett, Jun., Esq., Wm. Taylor Esq., S. Horrocks, Jun., Esq., C. Swainson, Esq., C. Swainson, Jun., Esq., T. Ainsworth, Esq., J. Blauchard, Esq., R.Friend, Esq., J,Kay, Esq., W. Calrow, Esq., G. Gradwell, Esq., D. Newham, Esq., A. Power, Esq., T. Miller, Esq., W. Talbot, Esq., and J. Bray, Esq., of Preston; G. Burrow, Esq., and J. Binns, Esq., of Lancaster; G. Stephenson, Esq., of London; W. Birley, Esq., of Kirkham; G. Thornber, Esq., of Poulton; Captain Denham, R. and J. King, Esqs., of Liverpool; Henry Boyce, and T. Downward, Esq., of London; James Dixon, Esqs., of Preston; the Revds. C. Hesketh, J. Hull, R. Moore, J. Pedder, J. Thurtell & c., &c., &c.

As nearly as we could calculate, from 380 to 400 persons sat down to the repast, including a great number of the squireacrchy, whose names we did not learn.
The Rev. C. Hesketh said the grace before and after meat, when the tables being cleared.
The Chairman gave the following toasts, introducing each of them in appropriate and elegant terms.
'The Queen, and the Ladies of England.' Four times four. Air, 'God save the Queen.'
'Prince Albert.' Three times three. Air, 'Rule Britannia.'
'The Queen Doweger.' Three times three. This toast was most rapturously received, and elicited 'one cheer more.'
'The Army and Navy. Three times three.

William Garnett, Esq. then rose, and said that as his stay was unavoidably short, he would avail himself of an early opportunity of proposing a toast, and he was quite sure that the company would not refuse to drink it in a bumper. He must confess that the events of the day, and what he had witnessed since his arrival, had afforded him the him the hightest delight, He had no interest in the great undertaking they had met to celebrate, and had no reason therefore to give anything but a disinterested and unbiassed opinion; and he had no hesitation in declaring it as the deliberate conviction of his mind, that the works in which the chairman had borne so prominent a part, would turn out to be a great national and public advantage. (Loud cheers.) He sincerely hoped that in its benefits and results, it might prove exceedingly advantageous to the projectors. (Cheers.) Perhaps there never was an undertaking commenced with less prospect of success than this one. It had been the custom to deride the project on all hands; and yet the result was, that in his judgement, Fleetwood would become a second Brighton. (Loud cheers.) He would give no opinion respecting the port, because he was not competent; but if the advantage of a port could be added to its other advantages, there could be no doubt but that it would be highly profitable. (Loud cheers.) He would avail himself of that occasion for addressing a word or two to Sir Hesketh Fleetwood in his capacity as a legislator of the country. He could not but deprecate the busy meddling spirit which had been manifested by those in high places, to interfere with projects of this kind. The effect of such interference might be to drive enterprise and capital out of the country, as had been the case in France, Denmark and other countries. A bill, entitled a 'Railway Bill,' had been introduced by Lord Seymour and Mr. Loch, the certain effect of which would be to impair and to destroy railway enterprise. (Cheers.) He hoped the hon. member would look to the subject in his place in parliament. Without further trespassing on the company, he would now beg to propose 'Prosperity, success, and every possible advantage to the Preston and Wyre Dock, Harbour, and Railway Company.' (Loud and continuous applause.)

The Chairman rose to return thanks. In the prosecution of these works, he had always been supported by the consciousness, that a man of high resolve could not fail, and that perseverance overcame difficulties - (Great cheering.) As the work progressed, individuals of knowledge and of science came down to inspect it, and they one and all reported favourably. From time to time friends flocked in and supported it, and it might be said of Fleetwood, and the undertaking generally, that almost every eminent engineer in the kingdom had visited and approved of it - (Loud cheers.) Some people talked of the gain being remote, but he felt even were this the case, there was a pleasure in handing down works of benefit and usefulness to ages when the projectors of them would cease to exist - (Cheers.) During that morning, they had been enjoying the benefits of pure air and water, and the proprietors of the undertaking had endeavoured to adapt it, alike for the advantages of pleasure and of commerce, or for the combination of both - (Applause.) In their acts of parliament they had endeavoured to keep their charges down to the lowest rates, thereby affording every facility to the public. He considered that such undertakings could not fail to be of public benefit. Every railway was like a vein or artery in the human system, connecting, feeding and invigorating the national system at large - (Cheers.) This being the case, there need be no jealous rivalry; but they should sink everyhing that had a tendency to mar and jar and work together as men bound by the ties of one holy and happy brotherhood, promoting, in harmony and good will, the happiness of each other, and striving only for the pre-eminence of being reciprocally of advantage to each other. (Loud and enthusiastic cheering). As to the exertions of the Wyre Company in future, the public might measure them by what had been already done. Their ambition was to render the spot where they then were, and the operations connected with it, a kind of artory by which to unite it and its occupants with the world at large - (Cheers.) In reference to the bill which had been referred to by his friend Mr. Garnett, he might state, that he had seen Lord Seymour and Mr. Lock on the subject, and had told them that the restrictions imposed by that bill ought equally to extent to all public companies - (Hear, hear.) He need not say, that he sould carfully watch the future progress of the bill, in fact he was interested, and that, perhaps, was the best security. (Cheers and laughter.) He begged to return his sincere thanks for the manner in which the last toast had been received. (The honourable baronet sat down amid enthusiastic cheering.) The healths of 'Mr. Brockholes, the High Sheriff,' and 'The Lord Lieutenant of the County,' were next given, and duly honoured by the company. The Chairman rose and said, that there was no toast which he had so much pleasure in proposing, as that which he now begged to introduce to the company. He meant the health of his brother,' The Rev. Charles Hesketh, and the Clergy present' - (Cheers).

The Rev. Charles Hesketh M.A. begged to return his thanks for the kind manner in which his health had been received by the company, and in which it had been proposed by his brother. He begged to congratulate their chairman upon the successful results of all his exertions, which he could truly say had been unwearied - (Cheers.) It appeared like magic, that such a town should spring up in a place, which only a few years ago was inhabited by rabbits, curlews and wild ducks. - (Cheers) He was glad to find, that among other public buildings, a church was in the course of erection. He hoped it would keep going up with railway speed, for among all the advantages they contemplated, this would not be found among the least - (Loud applause).

The Chairman gave us the next toast, 'The Manchester and Liverpool Railway.'
Wm. Garnett, Esq. as the only director of the Manchester and Liverpool Railway present begged to return thanks, and to assure them that anything which they could do in co-operation with the Preston and Wyre Railway Company shoud be done. (Cheers.) He begged to give the health of Mr. Geo. Stephenson the father of railways. (Great cheering.) The toast was drunk with three times three.

Geo. Stephenson, Esq,. rose to return thanks, and on his rising was greeted with tumultnous applause. He spoke very briefly, but in so low a tone, that amid the noise which prevailed, we could not catch an entire sentence of what he said. He concluded by proposing the health of Captain Denham R.N.

Captain Denham briefly returned thanks, and proposed the health of John Power Esq. the secretary, who also briefly and appropriately acknowledged the compliment. Mr Power proposed the health of his predecessor, Mr. Owen T. Alger.
The Chairman expressed his sorrow at the unavoidable absence of Mr. Alger, who was, he was sorry to say, confined to a sick bed. He could sincerely say, that Mr. ALger not being present, and the cause of his absence, deprived him of one half his pleasure on the occasion. He begged now to propose success to the North Union Railway Company. (Cheers.)
Chas. Swainson, Esq. returned thanks in a suitable speech, and proposed the health of Sir Hesketh Fleetwood. (Immense cheering.)
The Chairman in a speech characterized by eloquence and pathos expressed his acknowledgements.
The following toasts were then given and responded to ; but as by this time the wine began rather prominently to manifest itself in noisy and festive conviviality, the speeches were delivered for the most part in dumb show :-
'The Lancaster Railway.'-Responded to by George Burrow, Esq.
'The Longridge Railway.'
'The Lancashire Witches.'
'The Contractors for the Wyre Railway.'-(Mr. Stanton returned thanks.)
'The Rev. Mr. Thurtell.'
'Abel Smith, Esq. , and the Wyre Directors.'
'Mr. Burridge.'
The Chairman, in an excellent speech, proposed prosperity to the working classes.
Mr. Barton. F. Allen begged to propose the health of Mr. Kemp Sir Hesketh Fleetwood's agent ; who had purchased a whole line of railway without a single dispute or a single inquiry. The toast was drunk amid great applause, and Mr Kemp duly expressed his acknowledgements.

The train being now ready, a great portion of the company rose to depart, but we believe a large party remained behind and kept up the hilarity for some time longer, under the presidency of Sir Hesketh Fleetwood. Soon after the dejeuner was over a large party of ladies entered the room and remained until nearly the close of the proceedings. We understand that the evening was kept up by fire-works and other amusements, and that the rejoicings continued all day on Thurday; the visitors to Fleetwood on that day being exceedingly numerous.

RETURN TO PRESTON
About a quarter before seven o'clock we left the banqueting hall, and proceeded, amid the playing of the band and firing of guns to take our places in the railway carriages on our homeward journey. The train consisted of nine carriages, and the arrangements were so admirably conducted that not the least inconvenience or interruption arose in getting through the crowd to the respective positions assigned us. - We proceeded pleasantly and safely over the embankment, and, doubtless, should have arrived in Preston with the pleasing and consoling reflection of having spent a day unmixed by gloom, and unmarred by accident, but for an appaling and fatal accident which occurred to a man named Dean, a tailor, of this town. The particulars of the painful occurrence will be found below; it will be seen that the unfortunate deceased was intoxicated at the time of the accident, and that not the least blame is attachable to anyone but himself. This painful and untoward occurrence detained us about twenty minutes, and it was ten minutes past eight when the train arrived in Preston. With the solitary exception of this accident, nothing else occurred during the day to interfere, in the least degree, with the gaiety and gladness of the proceedings.

THE RAILWAY
Most of our readers are aware that there is only one line of rails on the Preston and Wyre line. It is nineteen miles and three-quarters in length, and has cost, up to the present time, about £260,000, or rather more than £13,000 per mile being we believe less considerably than the construction of any other railway in England has cost. The harbour, exclusive of the docks, is estimated to have cost from £40,000 to £50,000. The works on the railway generally, are, we are given to understand, not inferior to those of any other similar undertaking.

Barton Wilcockson Allen Part 2

So I have dealt with the first Allen family to go to Preston, what of Barton Fletcher Allen's children?
John Allen 1816 no further information.
Joseph Roscoe Allen 1817 from census was a civil engineer and landowner.
C1871 living Lentworth Hall, landowner employing 3 men.
wife Sarah Ann 46 from Durham,
children Ann Margt. 26 born Burton in Lunedale
Edith Mary 16 born Morcombe
Emily Roscoe 15 born Morcombe
Marian Reid 14 born Morcombe
Josephine G 11 born Morcombe
Parker Roscoe 10 born Morcombe
Gertrude 7 born Fullwood
Octavia Matel 5 born Fullwood
Charles Joseph R 3 born Fullwood
Barton Fletcher Allen 10m born Wyresdale
5 servants.
From the birthplaces of his children it would seem Joseph moved to Wyresdale some time between 1868 and 1870.

Liverpool Mercury etc. Wed May 17 1876.
Death
Allen- May 12, at his residence, Lentworth, near Lancaster, Joseph Roscoe Allen, Esq.

marriage Jun Quarter 1849 Joseph Roscoe Allen Settle 23 537
married Sarah Ann Parker
It would seem then that Anne Margt. age 26 (birth about 1845) is not of this marriage.

In the C1881 the family is split up.
The older daughters had moved to Weston Super Mare in Somerset
Annie M. Allen 30
Edith M. Allen 26
Marian K. Allen 24
Josephine G. Allen 21
living with 2 servants and living on income from dividends and mortgages

Gertrude Allen 17 and sister Mabel Allen 15 are scholars at Argyle House, The Avenue, Kingston on Thames, Surrey

Marriage Jun Quarter 1884 Axbridge 5c 1031 Josephine Grace Allen to Edmund Kemp Bourne
Death Jun Quarter 1890 Axbridge 5c 370 Josephine Grace Bourne
C1891 Warwick, Kenilworth
Edmund K Bourne 31 Medical Practitioner General
Muriel G. Bourne 5
Morrow (Marian) R. Allen 33 sister in law, daughter of Gentlm. living on own means
2 servants
Edmund then married Josephine's cousin.
Marriage Jun Quarter 1892 Warwick 6d 951 Edmund Kemp Bourne to Nina Maud Allen

Death Mar Quarter 1901 Marian Reid Allen age 41 Christchurch 2b 475

In C1881 Parker R. Allen age 20 was a student at Cooper Hill College in Windsor, Surrey.
possible marriage Jun Quarter 1904 Hastings 2b 57 Parker Roscoe Allen to Maud Clarkson
From google search there is an obituary for Parker R. Allen ? - 1912
331 Council in 1893 and was elected president in 1903
died at Bellary India 20th Dec 1912
Trained at Coopers Hill College.
He joined the Indian Public Works Department in .....and was first employed in connection with the Periyar Irrigation project.

possible marriage Mar 1907 Octavia Mabel Allen Reigate 2a 299.
Alice Allen 1819
Now this lady fascinates me. She lives with her father until the 1861 census when she is 42. Her father dies in 1864. Then she gets married in 1868.

The Leeds Mercury. Wed. Oct 7 1868
Marriages
PARK-ALLEN Oct 1st at Lillington, Warwickshire by the Rev. J. Wise Vicar, Philip Park Esq of Preston to Alice daughter of the late Barton Fletcher Allen Esq of Preston.

We then find the couple back in Preston in 1871 living in THE place to live in Preston.
22 Winckley Square.
Philip Park 75 Retired Civil Engineer Magistrate, born Goosnargh
Alice 51
along with a cook, waitress and Housemaid.

I have not found them in 1881, but in 1891 Alice Park aged 72 a widow living on own means with 2 servants is living at 10 Ribblesdale Place. (Isaac Wilcockson had lived at 12 Ribblesdale Place.)
And in 1901 she was still living there.
Richard Allen 1821
C1871 102a Fishergate, Preston
Richard Allen 49 General medical practitioner M.R.C.S. ??? born Preston
Emma E. 37 born Yorkshire
John H. F. Hamilton stepson 13 born Preston
Alice Allen 4 born Preston
John E. Wall visitor 16 clerk in drapery business
Elizabeth Crabtree 53 cook
Ann Lodhunter 23 housemaid
C1881 Richard is missing but Emma is down as married and surgeons wife living at 101a Fishergate, with daughter Alice now 14 and sister in law Annie Fearnley age 48 along with one servant Isabella Sandwell age 26
By 1891 Emma is a widow living on own means with Alice, Anne and servant Jessie McLean. They are living at 2 Avenham Tower.
In 1901 They are still living in Preston - Emma 67, Alice 34, Annie 68 and servant Annie E. Spencer 27.

Friday Dec 25 1885
On the 23d inst. after a short illness, at his residence 102 Fishergate, Preston, RICHARD ALLEN M.R.C.S. England and Surgeon-Major to the Royal North Lancashire Militia, youngest son of the late Barten Fletcher Allen of Preston.

The Medical Register
1859 Jan 1
Richard Allen 102 Fishergate Preston.
Lic. Soc. Apoth. Lond. 1844
Mem. R. Coll. Surg. Eng. 1846

Ann Allen 1823 no further information
Barten Fletcher Allen 1825/6
(Why did this man name his first born son Barten Wilcockson Allen?, I would be very interested if anyone can shed light on his early life. Also missing definite proof that he was the son of Barton Fletcher Allen Senior.)
I have been unable to find him before the 1871 census.

1871 - West Derby area, Sandfield?
Barton F. Allen 45 South American Merchant born Preston
Charlotte M 36 born Brazil, Brit. Sub.
Edith D. 11 born Brazil, Brit. Sub.
Frank 7 born Leamington
Ada M. 3 born W. Derby
Arthur D. G. 1 born W. Derby
Nina M 4m born Waterloo
Sophia G. 13 born Waterloo
living with 6 servants.

Then in 1881 Warwick, Leamington 12 Newbold Ter.
Carlota M. Allen 47 living on Railway Shares born Rio de Jen. Brazil
Grace R. 26 born Rio.
Edith D. 21 born Rio.
Barten W. Allen 19 Undergraduate Cambridge b. Leamington
Frank 17 b. Leamington
Ada M 13 b. Leamington
Mina M 10 b. Liverpool
Constance 8 b. Liverpool
Ellen D. L 7 b. Welford Northampton
living with 5 servants.

In 1891 Thorncliffe, Lillington
Carlota Maria Allen 57 again living on own means with daughters Grace Roscoe 36, Ada Miream 23, Nina Maud 19 and Constance Darby 18 with 4 servants.

marriages may be ;
Jun 1892 Nina Maud Allen to Edmund Kemp Bourne, Warwick 6d 951
Sep 1895 Ada Miriam Allen to Lawrence Thorneley Leech Warwich 6d 945
Sep 1902 Constance Denby Allen Warwick 6d 1147
(either Paul Rogers Cleave or Harry George Simpson)
Jun 1897 Arthur Denby Allen to Florence Line Warwick 6d 1263
Mar 1879 Sophia Gertrude Allen to William Burton Baker Warwick 6d 543
Mar 1886 Sophie Gertrude Baker (Allen) Marylebone 1a 959
(either Philip Patmore Peters or Charles Raymond Radclyffe
and Mar 1886 William Burton Baker Croydon 2a 273
to Ellen Elizabeth Postlethwaite (was this Sophia's husband???, did they divorce?)
Sep 1893 Barton Wilcockson Allen Warwick 6d 890
to Alice Mary E. Beaumont.

In 1901
Warwick Edmund k Bourne 41 Doctor living with Mina A. 30 (Nina), Minnie G 15 (Muriel) Dennis K 5, Kathleen 4, Thelma M. 2 with 3 servants.

living in Somerset Lawrence S. Leech 46 on own means born New York USA with Ada M. 27, Adwyn B. R. 4 and 3 servants.

living in Banbury Arthur Denbigh Allen 34 on own means with Florence 34 and 2 servants

living in Marylebone Carlota A. Allen 45 head of nursing home born Rio de Janero.

living at Foleshill
Barton Wilenkson Allen 39 Clergyman (church of England) Born Leamington
Alice Mary Eliz, 42
Barton Herbert B. 5
Roscoe Jace 4
living with 4 servants.

Cambridge University Alumni.
Barten Wilcockson, Allen
college Jesus
entered Michs. 1880
Adm. pens. (age 18) at Jesus, Oct.1.1880. S. of Barten Fletcher Esq., deceased. B at Leamington, Warws. school, St George's College Harrogate, Yorks. Matric. Michs. 1880 B.A.1884, M.A. 1932 Ord. deacon 1885, priest (Worchester) 1886; C. of Amblecote, Worcs, 1885-8. Held other curacies, 1888-93 V. of Foleshill with Longford, Warws, 1893-1904 V. of Kempsey, Worcs., 1904-17 Chaplain to the Forces, 1918-19. V. of Ettington, Warws., 1919-20 R. of Severn Stoke Worcs, 1920-32 Hon Canon of Worcester, 1927-36 Canon Emeritus, 1936 - of Abbey Lodge Tewkesbury (Crockford, 1938)

Entries in the Times newspaper.
Friday Oct 25 1940
ALLEN on Oct 23 1940 passed peacefully away of heart failure at Fawlings, Seer Green, Bucks the REV.CANON BARTEN WILCOCKSON ALLEN, former Vicar of Severn Stoke, Worcestershire.

Sat. Feb 14 1914
marriage
BEVILLE-BOURNE on Thursday the 12th Feb by licence Major Harry Gilbert Peyton Beville son of the late Maj Gen Henry Beville C.B. to Nina Maud Bourne daughter of the late Mrs. Barten Allen of Rossmore, Leamington.

Tue. May 30 1893
The Rev. Barten Wilcockson Allen has been presented to the vicarage of Foleshill in the diocese of Worcester.

Thurs. Dec 8 1881
On the 5th inst. at Harrington House Leamington, EDITH DENBY ALLEN the fourth daughter of the late Barten Fletcher Allen of Liverpool and Rio de Janeiro aged 21 years.

I also have a note (but not which newspaper)
Tuesday 4 May 1920
ALLEN - On the 1st May at 'Fettercairn' Leamington Spa. GRACE ROSCOE ALLEN eldest daughter of the late Baten Fletcher Allen of Liverpool and Rio de Janeiro aged 66 years RIP.

William Adam Allen 1827
Sat. Sep 8 1860
Thursday last Thwaites Church. William Adam youngest son of Barton Fletcher Allen to Agnes youngest daughter of John Lewthwaite Esq. of Broadgate Cumberland.

in 1861 the couple were in Lytham with Joseph Dixon cotton spinner and his family.
in C1871 living in Poole, William is 42, a retired cotton spinner. They have 2 servants and a daughter Margaret A. Allen age 7 born in Preston. By the next census Agnes is living in Altrincham living on income from dividends and Margaret Anne Allen age 17 is a pupil in Hendon, Middlesex. In 1891 Margaret 27 is living on own means in Ulverston.
Charles Thomas Allen 1829
possible death Mar quarter 1845, Preston.

(please do not rely on my numbers and references if ordering certificates, it is very easy to make mistakes so please go to the Free BMD site to check them.)

Barton Wilcockson Allen Part 1.

I embarked on researching this name because 1) the middle name Wilcockson and 2) his father was born in Preston. I wanted to see if anyone else in the Allen family had the Wilcockson middle name or if there was a marriage into the Wilcockson family. At the moment there is no indication of a connection to our Wilcockson family but I believe there must have been contact between the two families in Preston. Whether this was a strong friendship or business connections I do not think that someone would have lightly named their firstborn son, the middle name Wilcockson when for the previous two generations Barton Fletcher Allen had been used. My guess at the moment is that Barton Fletcher Allen senior knew Isaac Wilcockson the newspaper man who had no children, and that Issac knew Bartons son Barton Fletcher junior and in some way helped him or had a close relation with him. Any suggestions more than welcome. In the course of this I contacted Chuck a member of the Allen family in America to see if there was any information which could shed light on this question. He kindly answered and I am putting this research up for him to read (it is also interesting to us to know about). Also I know I will forget in a couple of weeks what my thoughts were on this.

I HAVE NOT VERIFIED this research, it is based on the internet using IGI, National Archives, Google search and FreeBMD sites. The census information and the newspaper articles however have been sourced from primary documents.

There is a second connection that I found in the family to the Quakers. (National Archives site) Information relating to document ref no. DDX813/6 Lease for 20 years at rent of £2 Joseph Roscoe Allen of Morecambe esq. to Joseph Kelsall of Over Wyersdale and others - building now used as a meeting house and school by the Quakers with burial ground and adjacent land. (Lancashire record office 1854).
And in the 1871 census Joseph and his family are living in Over Wyresdale at Lentworth Hall next entry to Joshua Kelsall. Now the Wilcocksons link to the area through the Dilworth family and perhaps business links from David Wilcocksons Hat business.

The basic Allen tree I have come up with so far is as follows :
Barton Fletcher Allen 1783 - 1864
Grace Roscoe
married at Prestwich Parish Church
children :
John Allen c. 26 Jan 1816 Ringley
Joseph Roscoe Allen c. 9 May 1817 Ringley
Alice Allen c. 12 Aug 1819 Ringley
Richard Allen c. 14 Oct 1821 Ringley
Ann Allen c. 4 Jun 1823 St. John Preston
maybe also c. 26 Jul 1824 Ringley
Barton Fletcher Allen : no christening found, seems to have been born around 1825, 1826
William Adam Allen c. 3 Aug 1827 St. John Preston
Charles Thomas Allen c. 22 May 1829 St. John Preston
................................................................................
Barton was born the same year 1783 as our Isaac Wilcockson. Why and when did Barton move to Preston? Well Preston and the area seem to be growing quickly due to the textile industry. Barton himself says he lived in Preston from about 1800.
Preston Guardian etc. Sat. July 3 1847
Court of Enquiry
Claim for Compensation
The Fleetwood, Preston and West Riding Railway Company and the Trustees of the Peel Hall Estate
"Mr Barton Fletcher Allen, who being sworn, stated that he had been a land agent and surveyor for more than 28 years in Preston, where he had resided for nearly 47 years."

There is an 1801 census for Preston which names head of the household and number of persons living there but no addresses. There are no entries for Allen, but this only means he was not a head of a household in Preston he might well have been lodging with someone. Then why were his first five children christened in Ringley and Ann appears to have been christened twice - in Preston and Ringley?

I have Baines Lancashire Directory for 1825 the entry for Barton is as follows
Allan B.F. corn merchant h1, Jordan Street
Corn and flour Dlrs.
Allan Barton Fletcher & co. 12 Lord Street.
So in 1825 he was definitely living at number 1 Jordan Street in Preston and carrying on a business in Lord Street.

In the 1841 census living in Jordan Street Preston were -
Joseph R. Allen 24 Civil Engineer
Alice Allen 20 Ind
Ann Allen 18 Ind
William Adam Allen 14
Charles T. Allen 12
Margaret 45 Ind
Margaret 55 F.S
Martha 20 F.S

The two Barton Fletcher Allens are missing.
I have also been unable to locate our Isaac Wilcockson.

What about the corn business?
Preston Chronicle Saturday March 16 1833
"The Partnership heretofore carried on at Preston by BARTON FLETCHER ALLEN and JOHN DAVIDSON, as Corn Dealers, under the firm of B.F. ALLEN & Co. and at Walton-le-Dale under the firm of 'John Davidson and Co' as Millers, was disolved on the 1st day of May, 1831 by mutual consent. It is requested that all persons in debebted to the partnership concern carried on at Preston will immediately pay their accounts to the said Barton Fletcher Allen who wil discharge any debts that may be owing from that concern, and all persons indebted to the concern at Walton-le-dale, are requested immediately to pay the same to the said John Davidosn, who will discharge any accounts that may be owing from the same concern -
Witness our hands this 8th January 1833
JOHN DAVIDSON
B.F.ALLEN
witness W. Ormerod Pilkington

In the Preston Chronicle Sat. July 2 1836 is mentioned
'Mr. Barton Fletcher Allen Land Surveyor'

According to the 1847 paper, Barton was a land agent from about 1819.
Preston Guardian etc. Sat. Aug 25 1849
Preston County Court
Right of Fishing in the River Ribble, At Ashton
'Mr. Barton Fletcher Allen, who said : I was formerly assistant agent for the property of the Hoghton family. I commenced my agency on the first of August 1800, and during that time I have seen the fisheries of Lea, Ashton, Ingol, and Cottam let. Mr Fletcher was the principle agent or steward of the property, and he let them.

From the National Archives
DDHO/41 Letter Elizabeth Harvey to Mr. B.F. Allen acknowledging receipt of £20 and referring to the death of Major General Hoghton. 23 Jun 1811
DDHO/411 Letter Eliz. Harvey, Nethersfield to Mr. B.F. Allen at Walton Hall acknowledging receipt of £10. 17 Nov 1810

also
QSP/2952/125 Amounderness Hundred
Bill of B.F.Allen and E.Elletson High Constables for census enumeration c.1831
QSP/2960/115
Account of payment of one year's salary to B.F.Allen High Constable of Amounderness Hundred c. 1832

Preston Chronicle Sat. Oct 10 1840
"Mr Barton F. Allen ably sustained the office of vice-chairman."
Annual Meeting of the Preston Agricultural society.

The Preston Guardian etc. Sat Oct 6 1849
Police cases during the week
NUISANCE- On Monday last, Mr. Barton Fletcher Allen was summoned as the agent of property for a nuisance at the Snuff Mill Dam, caused by a deposit of filth in the lodge there. The case was adjourned till Monday, to give time to abate the nuisance.

Sat. Dec 10 1853
Institution for the Diffusion of knowledge, Preston.
Exhibition of paintings and other works of Art 1854
The list of Patrons includes both Barton Fletcher Allen Esq. and Isaac Wilcockson Esq.

The last census we have for Barton is in 1861 when he is living at 24 West Cliff, Preston :
Barton F. Allen 77 landed proprietor born Prestwich
Alice Allen 42 born Preston
Margaret Roscoe 66 sister in law born Liverpool
Isabella Mcmillan cook
Susannah Dacre housemaid

Liverpool Mercury etc. Monday Nov 21 1864
Deaths
Allen- Nov 17 at West Cliffe, Preston in his 82nd year Barton Fletcher Allen, Esq. of The Shoretop in the Parish of Prestwich.
(Through google search have come up with two places which may or may not be of interest, Shore Top Farm, Kearsley Rd, Radcliffe and Outwood's Shoretop Reservoir.)

Barton was also mentioned in an article about the opening of the Preston and Wyre railway in 1840 which I have copied out in full later.

Saturday, 18 April 2009

My Quaker day out.

Well - what a lovely mothers day present I had on the 18th April 2009. I went to the Quaker conference in Skipton and met Richard.

Firstly many thanks to Richard for passing on to me information about the Wilcocksons from Preston. Unfortunately we did not have enough time to properly talk and I as usual was unprepared and in (I can only excuse myself, too much excitement) awe. The first thing I should have told him about was this blog .......anyways I shall write to him and ask his permission to use the materials he gave me. He has already sent me an outline of the family tree which goes back much further than mine. He has visited many of the places relevant to the family. I also met Richard's wife Sheila. What lovely people. I am so happy with my growing family. Can you tell that I have not recovered from yesterday, sorry if I am not making much sense.

Anyway before I forget I shall record an account of my day.
............................................................................................
I should have realised early on that this was going to be a good day, a successful day.......I didn't sleep well and was up with the birds at 5.30 to blue skies. Despite my early rising we were on the last minute for departure and rushing to the end of the street saw the bus already at the bus stop. Poor Joseph, we legged it and luckily it was one of the nice bus drivers who waited for us. Then when we got into town we saw the free bus to take us up to Piccadilly, so we arrived in very good time. There was no que (haha Joseph's just made a joke....not Q from star trek, I asked him for the spelling) for tickets and Joseph saw on the departure board an earlier train to Leeds. We just had time to buy his railway magazines and the newspaper and the train arrived at the platform at the same time as us. It was nice and quiet. I was thinking good, we will have more of an allowance for late running trains and maybe get to Skipton even earlier than planned....(I am happy to say that all the trains we used ran to time). At Leeds we literally stepped off one train and on to another.

It must have meant to be, catching the earlier train that Joseph sat on the side to see Keighley and Worth station that soon after leaving Leeds stopped at a junction, Joseph saw a heritage diesel excursion train. The rest of the journey was spent discussing possibilities of this train. He was unlucky at Keighley there was no steam train in. So I said that we would wait at Skipton to see if the diesel train came through. Well we waited, and we waited. Anyone else would have given up but having just lately been on the Tin Bath excursion we were well aware that these trains are held at junctions sometimes for considerable periods of time......We saw the departure of the Bradford train and three trains to Leeds and were just on the point of saying we will have to go now when there was an announcement and just as they finished saying stand back from the edge on platform three it came thundering around the bend. Full speed. Rattling and rushing. Oh such a thrill. Joseph had his camera at the ready, I think his hands were shaking. It was passed in a moment. I was so pleased for Joseph. And do you know we were the only ones at Skipton and along the way we had seen no other enthusiasts out with cameras. Later when we got home Joseph looked it up on the internet and that train had come from Holyhead. I must say they had a lovely day for doing the Settle-Carlisle run.

Anyways, Joseph's good fortune did not end there for on the way to finding Skipton Meeting House what did mother see but one of her loves, a bargain book shop. We had to go in didn't we. Unfortunately I got nothing, but Joseph came out with two new books. They were study books, mind you, but he had seen them on the shelf whilst I had been looking for railway books or history books for me.

We found Skipton Meeting House hidden away from the general hustle and bustle of Skipton market day down a ginnel. Nestled behind protective stone walls the stillness and peacefulness of a beautiful pocket sized garden bathed in sunlight was a most attractive foreground to the stone meeting house. It was obviously a place looked after with much love. What was the picture like hundreds of years ago when the Friends came to meeting with long flowing dresses when inclement weather did not give such a warm welcome. You see I always think of questions to ask well after the event, I should have liked to have known how far they came to meetings here. Were they Skipton folk or travelled from roundabout? As you passed through the gate into this place of sanctuary the meeting house is on your left and to the right another building where there was a reception room, kitchen and toilets. It was here I met Richard. There was refreshments, and a book stall. There was 38 of us present, I know this because they gave us a sheet with the programme and a second sheet with a list of all those present - what a good idea. Everyone was very friendly and welcoming.

The actual talks took place inside the single storey Meeting House. Inside the floor was flagged and it was separated into two parts by a sort of wooden screen, we sat on one side in wooden bench like seats and at the rear was a raised section. The first talk was about the history of the Skipton meeting. When the Meeting House had been first built it had a thatched roof and the inside would have been open to the rafters. That certainly would have changed my fanciful flight into the past. Again challenging my preconceptions. At one time there was a Quaker school nearby and some of the boy pupils had carved their names or initials into the wooden seats at the back. At another time there had also been an adult Quaker school - I should have liked to know more about that.

The second and third talks were about personal family trees. There were several interesting points to me that came up. The difficulties of putting on family trees where cousins married cousins, I did like the method shown. Families are not neat little 2D packages that can easily be described in flat 'trees' but are vibrant living complexities. Lately I have been looking at Barton Wilcockson Allen for a possible connection, the best I have come up with is the possibility that there was a friendship or business connection between the Allens and Issac Wilcockson who had no children. How could this, or even should this be shown on a family tree. Were friendships, business associations just as important? This also has me thinking about the importance of a name. Also not to be afraid to come up with solutions that work for you. Mention was made of those trees which separate male and female issue. I must admit that I often get confused when trying to find my way round family trees. I am not even sure that having a standard format is helpful.
Another reassuring point was that there are many many questions to which we shall never find the answers because the records are just not there. We may come up with plausible answers but we must be prepared to accept that that is what they are.
That it seems common for people to have married more than once.
The last talk was about the early Friends in Dent. I found many interesting points in this talk too. (I have not come across any evidence to suggest that the Wilcocksons were amongst the early converts.) It would appear that George Fox was predisposed to travel to places where he might be favourably received because they were already areas open to liberal thought. That many of the early converts were people of modest means and people of standing in the local communities rather than ordinary working folk. That the original convert group in Dent consisted of 5-6 (goodness I have already forgotten, I know one was a youth) persons. That the early Quakers were drawn from rural rather than urban folk. That there came to be a change in attitude within the Quaker movement between the original convert generation and the next generation ie. intolerance to drink. Mr. Boulton made reference to the fact that many early converts were drawn from military men who had been part of Cromwell's Model Army because they were 'liberal' thinkers. I think another area of ignorance for myself. So then......
Who in the Wilcockson family was the first to convert to Quakerism?
How did they become converted?
More questions.
I shall just close and say we had an uneventful journey home albeit two tired travellers arrived at 7.20 pm. having returned via the long route to Manchester Victoria.

Monday, 16 March 2009

Family history story.

Well, what an exciting few days I have had. It was a bit of a difficult week what with exam results due etc. The week before I had been browsing the library shelves and picked out a book about Preston. In the back was a list of subscribers. I did a google search and it led me to the Quaker family history society site. They are having a one day conference on Saturday 18th April 2009 at Skipton Friends Meeting House 10.30 am til 16.00. There are going to be two talks, and the one I am most interest is is going to be talking about the Quaker archives at Leeds. (I think that after I am finished with Lancashire Records Office that is the next place to go looking.) It is free to attend and you do not need to be a member but you do have to let them know you will be attending and there was a form to send off. Which I did along with a letter asking if he belonged to the Wilcocksons from Preston. Now I am a very shy person and it took a lot of deliberation before plucking up the courage to actually send it. And I never even thought of the consequences of putting a phone number on the form, but he actually phoned me on Sunday.



I think I made a fool of myself. But I was so dropped on, and I am never very good on the phone. He was really nice and yes he does belong to our Wilcocksons. And he's going to be at the conference. I really really hope I get to go. I do not think he uses the computer much but if he does manage to find this site I'd like to say welcome to Richard. He did family history research during the 80s and 90s and has visited places connected to the family. Ohhhhhhhh I was so excited but scared at the same time. I never know what to say at the best of times. I know I bore my family much of the time when I start rabbiting on about this and that. It does say about the conference to take your own family tree so I hope to compare thoughts. And of course I am looking forward to meeting Richard.



He was able to tell me that I was mistaken about 12 Ribblesdale Place, the home of Isaac. The original building has been replaced. Richard thinks it was a fire that destroyed the original house. But the street is the original and the house next door was there, and that fantastic position on the precipice, so although naturally I am disappointed I am still thrilled that so much of the original Preston in that area remains today and you really do get the feeling of walking in their footsteps. It also highlights how good it is to have companionship along the way with family history......and how necessary to have someone to point out when you have made a mistake and lend their knowledge to the quest. Perhaps I can be a bit self indulgent here and outline what interests me and my view on family history. I would be interested to here what interests you too.



Most importantly I think family history as a hobby is what the person wants out of it. Some people just want to get as far back as possible, some people want to collect names and get as big a tree as they can, someone else might just want to study one persons life in great detail, others might want to investigate their ancestors lives, for others it expands into social history in general. I fall into the later category. I respect everyones right to follow their own objective. I get a real thrill seeing old documents to think that you can actually touch the past. That I can know the name of someone who walked this earth 200 and odd years ago. It does not matter to me if they are related or not. And to say that persons name even if it is just a first name is to remember them. I am not interested in famous history - royalty, nor in scandals, nor seeking riches and I am not particularly interested in military history. I am interested in the everyday lives of ordinary people. What did they do, where did they live, how did they travel, I cry over a scrawled x on a marriage certificate. I feel anger for past injustices. I tingle when I walk where I know they walked. I wonder what they thought about. I like to see the world as they saw it. I marvel at how little I know and how much of what I thought I knew turns out not to be true at all. It is a constant journey of enlightenment. It also has changed my views on life today. Mum once gave me some buttons which had been cut off a mans working uniform on the railways in case they came in handy some time... these are as precious to me as if someone had given me gold jewelry. And in seeing a signature connects me to that person. What were they thinking? Whilst I have great enthusiasm I am also aware that leads me to be prone to making mistakes. Excitement leads me to making assumptions, not taking time to check my work, to overlooking clues because I am always dashing off down some new avenue. I am notoriously disorganised, I can never lay my hand on whatever I am looking for, I forget to fully document my findings but acknowledging this means I can accept that I will never know everything and that others can point out my mistakes. And that is enough rambling for tonight.

Monday, 9 March 2009

Susannah Letman.

In response to Pams question, how did Edward and Susannah meet?

Susannah is a difficult lady to track down in the census. I have found her in C.1871 as a child with her family. We have her in 1901 as Edward's wife. But where was she in 1881 and 1891? By following other members of her family it appears that both her parents had died before 1881. Some of her siblings appear to be living with their Uncle and Aunt. I have not found Susannah in the 1881 census, have you Pam? It could just be that she was there too but missed off, or more likely that she was somewhere working most probably in service. Her birth was registered in 1868 which would make her 12/13 in 1881. Now moving on to the 1891 census I think this is probably her -

Preston, Broughton near Preston
Fulwood
3 Brakenbury Rd.
William Gornall 32 implement agent born Wyresdale
Margaret 27 born Preston
Ethel M. 4 born Preston
Anne 28 born Wyresdale
Susan Sethman 22 servant born Hawarden

On the screen it looks more like Lethman.
This puts her in the vicinity of Preston and Edward. (Also is it just a coincidence - Wyresdale.)

Friday, 6 March 2009

My day in Preston.

I had to post this today, 6 March 2009 before I forget. I went to Preston last Friday and I went today, primarily to pick up a photocopy I ordered from the records office. Its a 20 min. walk cum hop cum little run to the station, 50 min on the train and then about 10 min. fast walk from Preston station to the records office and this morning the train was late. So you can see that by the time I finally get there I am already harassed and exhausted. Especially as the record office is on the first floor - those stairs seem very steep. Then there is the usual struggle to get everything into the lockers they supply without dropping everything on the floor, you are not allowed bags and coats in the search room. Anticipation making a simple job harder. Then you have to sign in. Then wait to be let in. By this time I'm humming like a sprinter waiting for the start gun.
I am getting to like Preston records office, now that I am more comfortable with the layout and gaining a little understanding of the way it works. In particular there is one lady who is very helpful. But its still very much like a lucky dip - there is this pirates cave with unknown treasures you put in your hand pull something out and it may be dross or pure gold. I don't even know what I am looking for half of the time. Today more than ever I knew that I was on a strict time limit. Last Friday I only managed to catch the train home by the skin of my teeth.....and ended up a huffing puffing red faced blob who was very happy that the carriage was empty and I could recover without any embarrassment. And today I had very very ambitious plans more of which I will reveal later.......
So 1 o'clock was the deadline, now get on with the tale. I collected the photocopy, put in a request for burials Preston meeting house 1837-1855 then not to waste a minute plucked an 1824 Lancashire directory off the shelf to peruse whilst I waited. Then I remembered that last week I found out where the Guild roll microfiche were so I jumped up to lay claim to a machine. It was quite busy today. With quivering hands, which invariable occurs on the first use of a new type of document I was quite confident that I would find something ......now I only checked one, thinking they would be on there but found no Wilcocksons. Disappointment, I also had trouble following the layout so will have to have another look at these records another time. I refrained from stamping my foot or slamming the microfiche draw shut, I didn't even tut. Oh no, times too precious for wasting a second. Around the walls are shelves of books and files. Skimming along the spines my heart jumped....Quakers, there are about five books I want to read but no time today. So a quick flick through ohhhh why don't I live in Preston. Then I glance up and see that my number is up. There is a display scene at one end of the room and when your document is ready for collection your number scrolls endlessly from one end to the other. I'm torn, can I spend a few more moments looking through these books or will there be something more exciting in the burial records? Reluctantly the books are abandoned. Trying not to look too eager I saunter to the counter to collect, I don't know why but this bit always makes me feel like I'm back at school going to the teachers desk at the front of the classroom and I know everyone is equally engrossed in their own research but I can't help but feel a hundred eyes boring into my back and just hope I don't disgrace myself by tripping up or dropping something. The walk back seems even further. I was expecting a ledger, what I got was a single sheet of paper. There were not a lot of names on it and they were in alphabetical order so not the original records. There were no Wilcocksons. Hmmmmmmm. Time up, no chance to end on a high note. But then this is what I am use to, so much time spent with little to show for it. Then this is also the fun of the thing too. And anyways I was desperate for a drink. So time to grab my things and head for the great outdoors for I had another mission for today, a far greater mission.
I wanted to see if I could find the house of Isaac Wilcockson. I had memorised how to get from the records office. Not stopping to leisurely quench my thirst but swigging from a bottle of water on the hoof I trotted off. The sky was blue, the sun was shining. Being lunch time the center was teeming, people getting in my way slowing me down but luckily I was soon turning off the main street. It was only a few moments before my heart was lifting and amazement filling me. Oh oh I'm in love, I'm in love with Preston. Apart from the Harris museum building I have not been impressed with Preston before but now I've seen another side. A side of graceful buildings, of streets I can imagine pictures of the past. The Preston I have sought is the one the Wilcocksons would have seen. The Preston of before Victorian times, the Preston that drew the Wilcockson there in the first place. I think I have found part of it. Its only just behind the main street - the noisy bustling thoroughfare is soon replaced with peace and quiet (well apart from the traffic) and so it must also have been in days gone by. This was the well to do part of town I think. I am going back and I will have more time with a camera to take photos but this was a scouting expedition. No time to linger and soak in the atmosphere. The clock is ticking, will I find it? Will it even still be there? My step quickens, I can't quite believe how pretty it is. Then the end of the road and .........speechless, no words to describe. I have to stop. I am standing at the park gates and lying beneath me spread out at my feet the land falls away and I am looking out over a plain. What a picture, what a view. And away to my left is Ribblesdale Place - the street where Isaac lived. Now I know we cannot rely on house numbers as they may have changed over time. In the census of 1851 and 1861 Isaac is living at number 12. The present number 12 is next but one to the park entrance and at this point I feel this was probably Isaac's house. (See update to this in 'Family history story', this is not the original house.) It backs onto the park and must have spectacular views. The house directly next to the park entrance has a blue plaque on the wall. Number 12 is a detached property and has been (I do not know the correct word - the brickwork covered and painted) altered by the look of it. I walked up the street, ohhh there's a building I've seen in books....the Harris Institute(? need to double check) a majestic building but oh so sad with a for sale board proclaiming it rejected status. And flowing away just such a lovely walkway I can see them dressed up in their finery promenading, and its all on Isaacs doorstep!!!! I have seen drawings of walks in Preston, now I need to match them up with street names. The really rich place in Preston is just a street away so Isaac must have mingled with the best of Preston society.
I had one more thing to do today. So no time to waste. A good job it wasn't far from the maddening crowds for I was determined to revisit the Harris library and ask about joining. This I managed to do.....now I can borrow books next time I go. And to cap it all even had a few spare moments to go upstairs into the reference library. Another place I could spend years in. And asked about the 1801 census which I shall post about another time. Then it was pant pant, but not quite as bad as last week, as I retraced my steps to the station. I didn't even waste the return journey - I was reading a gripping book about London's history, all about plagues and fires and train crashes. So you see all in all I had a very busy day and I am quite ready for a quiet weekend.

Follower.

I have my first follower.......never had one before. Please reveal yourself I am intrigued.
................................................
Sorry I have just worked out a bit more how to use this blog, another example of how inept I am with computers.

Welcome to Pam. I have just seen your comment of Feb 15 (posting this 7th March), yes I would very much like details of your line. I have sent you a message on genes reunited which sounds very impersonal but I wrote that before this. (I do not have a family tree on the internet or computer, too complicated). I will not be posting any details on this blog about living persons because of the risk of identity fraud. I am sorry about not replying to you before but do not come on here unless I am posting. That does not mean that I have not been doing family history, I am afraid that the last few weeks I have been rather obsessed with new lines of thought but which have been taxing my limited brain power........

Tuesday, 27 January 2009

Cotton famine.

Must put this on before I forget - was flicking through a book I have (it has no index) "Cotton Mills of Preston, The Power behind the Thread by T.C. Dickinson 2002". page 47 It is a book all about the different steam engines used in the cotton mills.
.................................................................................................
Further along Rigby Street at its junction with Cemetery Road was Albert Mill, a manufactory which had been established in the second half of the 1850s, and listed in the 1857 Directory for Wilcockson, Swarbrick & Jesper at Ribbleton Lane. Following several changes in ownership the mill was under the Barnacre Weaving Co. Ltd in 1898.
..................................................................................................
In the 1861 census John Wilcockson was listed as cotton mill manufacturer, I wonder if it was this one ?
.................................................................................................
.................................................................................................
One of the social history events I am interested in is the "Cotton famine". In other branches I have cotton workers, but the Wilcocksons must also have been effected. In 1861 William Dilworth (mother Ann Wilcockson) was a shopman and John Wilcockson was the cotton manufacturer by 1871 William was a farmer and John had moved to Lytham as a coal agent. Did they lose a lot of money due to the cotton crisis? Or another theory, that Preston as an industrial town was not a pleasant place to live? Or another theory the Quakers were against slavery perhaps John decided to get out of the cotton trade on principle.
I have not studied the issue in detail. Just picking up little bits and pieces.
The following taken from "The Lancashire Cotton Famine around Leigh by Fred Holcroft 2003" "Between 1861 and 1865 an economic and social catastrophe, not of its own making, struck Lancashire, where over four-fifths of the British cotton manufacturing industry was concentrated. Weekly, the Lancashire mills consumed 48,000 bales of cotton, each weighing 400 lbs, of which 41,000 bales were sent from the southern states of the U.S.A. where the cotton had been grown on plantations worked by Negro slaves.
For years the abolitionists in the northern states had campaigned for the removal of slavery, and with the election of Abraham Lincoln to the presidency in November 1860, several southern states felt threatened, so they left (seceded) to form their own government, the Confederate States of America. The American Civil War was fought to bring the southern states back into the fold. As part of their strategy, the northern forces blockaded the southern ports, in order to stop the exports of raw cotton, which were being used to pay for imports of munitions and other war equipment. This created raw material shortages in the cotton manufacturing industry, which became known as the 'Cotton Famine'.
Throughout 1861 the Lancashire cotton mills ran down the stocks of raw cotton, which had been built up during the recent boom years, until they were gradually used up. The cotton mills were forced to begin short-time working and eventually stopped altogether, causing widespread unemployment, 'distress' as it was called in the newspapers, in a county where cotton manufacturing was the largest employer of labour, and 300,000 people were engaged making cotton goods.
The social consequences for Lancashire were massive : loss of earnings, savings and belongings, and an unprecedented strain on the social security system of that time. Its effects were felt in every Lancashire town."
.............................................................................................
T.C. Dickinson in his book " Cotton Mills of Preston" writes on the issue.
"The decade of the 1860s are remembered for the appalling effects the American Civil War of 1861-65 had on the Lancashire cotton industry, in particular on the livelihoods of its operatives. When Abraham Lincoln became President of the United States in 1860, the southern states began to see their economic standing increasingly subordinated to that of the north, and although the enslavement of Africans on the southern cotton plantations gave the impeding war a moral issue, it was never at the root of it. As war commenced, a blockade of cotton shipments had an immediate effect on the Lancashire industry but contrary to popular belief the crisis in Lancashire was not entirely due to a shortage in cotton.
In 1860 over three quarters of Lancahire's cotton had arrived from the southern states, and in the previous year more cotton had been produced than was needed. Lancashire manufacturers took advantage of this cheap and plentiful supply as well as a large demand for cotton goods from the Far East by working their mills at high pressure to enjoy two years of almost unexampled prosperity.
By May 1860 the overseas demand had been met and a large supply of cotton goods accumulated, which would have led to loss of profits if the high rate of production had gone on. Many mill owners found themselves weakened by over-extension and in need of working capital, and in one respect the Cotton Famine was to benefit a good many Lancashire manufacturers in that by the autumn of 1862 and the spring of 1863, when cotton goods were in demand, they were able to sell off their stocks at much higher prices than normal. These gains help to explain why bankers showed confidence in the cotton industry about this time, and why during 1863 the construction of mills previously contracted for had been resumed."
.......................................................................................
I am dismayed at my education. I knew more about the plight of the Slaves until finding out more about the Lancashire cotton industry - that at the same time cotton mill operatives over here were just as much put upon. Having visited a mill where the machines were in action I do not know how they stood the noise for a start off, then when you see the young children in the census as working in the mills you weep for their lost childhood, then when you read about the living conditions you get mad, no security ........then so much suffering during the cotton famine and then there is a statue of Abraham Lincoln in Manchester because of the support given him in his battle against slavery. How manipulated are we? (This family history can be very painful at times.)